这本《中国大学生英语口语分析性评估体系的构建与效验》由刘芹所著，在口试评分标准制定方面做了卓有成效的探索。作者以分析性评分模式为切人点，以多种理论模式为依据，以现行英语教学大纲为基准，在大规模调研的基础上，提出了分析性口语评估体系(OARS)。

这本《中国大学生英语口语分析性评估体系的构建与效验》由刘芹所著，作者以Bachman的交际语言能力(CLA)模式、Cohen的语用口试等级评分表、Nunn的小组讨论等级评分表、高校英语教学大纲为基础，结合大规模问卷调查结果构建了中国大学生口语评估体系。在将其运用于来自六类院校180名学生的口语评估后，对其进行了全面的效度研究，同时深入探讨了中国大学生英语口语的普遍特征。作者提出的口语评估体系具备科学性和可行性，对口语测试评分标准的改进和完善具有借鉴意义，对提高口语测试的总体效度有着很高的理论意义和应用价值。《中国大学生英语口语分析性评估体系的构建与效验》的读者对象为从事英语口语教学评估的研究人员和专业学生，也可供高校英语教师参考使用。

List of Acronyms

List of Figures

List of Tables

Chapter 1 Introduction

 1.1 Need for the study

 1.2 Configuration of the study

 1.3 Significance of the study

 1.4 Layout of the book

 1.5 Summary

Chapter 2 Literature Review

 2.1 Fundamentals of oral proficiency

 2.2 Classification of oral rating scales

 2.3 Summary

Chapter 3 Study Bases

 3.1 Empirical basis

 3.2 Theoretical basis

 3.3 Summary

Chapter 4 Construction of OARS

 4.1 Needs analysis

 4.2 Description of OARS

 4.3 Sample rating

 4.4 Summary

Chapter 5 The Pilot Validation Study

 5.1 Research purpose

 5.2 Research subjects and task

 5.3 Research operation

 5.4 Data analysis

 5.5 Discussion

 5.6 Summary

Chapter 6 The Field Validation Study

 6.1 Research purpose

 6.2 Research subjects and task

 6.3 Research operation

 6.4 Data analysis

 6.5 Discussion

 6.6 Summary

Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations

 7.1 Validation results

 7.2 Washback effects

 7.3 Existing problems

 7.4 Further research

 7.5 Summary

Bibliography

Appendix 1 Empirical Basis

 Appendix 1.1 Requirements for Oral Proficiency of English Majors (Chinese version)

 Appendix 1.2 Requirements for Oral Proficiency of non-English Majors (Chinese version)

 Appendix 1.3 Requirements for Pronunciation of English Majors at Band 2 & Band 4 ( Chinese version)

 Appendix 1.4 Rating Scale & Range Descriptions of CET-SET (Chinese version)

 Appendix 1.5 Range Descriptions of TEM4-Oral ( Chinese version)

 Appendix 1.6 Range Descriptions of TEMS-Oral ( Chinese version)

Appendix 2 Questionnaires

 Appendix 2.1 OARS Trial Questionnaire

 Appendix 2.2 OARS Teachers' Questionnaire

 Appendix 2.3 OARS Students' Questionnaire

 Appendix 2.4 Candidate's Questionnaire — the Pilot Study

Appendix 3 Experiments

 Appendix 3.1 Experimental Test of Sample Rating Ⅰ

 Appendix 3.2 Experimental Test of Sample Rating Ⅱ

 Appendix 3.3 Experimental Test of the Validation Study — Role Cards

Appendix 4 Data of the Validation Study

 Appendix 4.1 Candidates' Raw Scores on ORAL, TEM4 & TEM8 — the Pilot Study

 Appendix 4.2 Raw Scores of Candidates' Ratings — the Pilot Study

 Appendix 4.3 Raw Scores of Raters' Detailed Ratings — the Pilot Study

 Appendix 4.4 Raw Scores of Teachers' Rough Ratings — the Pilot Study

 Appendix 4.5 Sub-total Correlation Matrix — the Pilot Study

 Appendix 4.6 Sub-total Correlation Matrix for English (key) Candidates — the Field Study

 Appendix 4.7 Sub-total Correlation Matrix for Arts (key) Candidates — the Field Study

 Appendix 4.8 Sub-total Correlation Matrix for Science (key) Candidates — the Field Study

 Appendix 4.9 Sub-total Correlation Matrix for Arts (local) Candidates — the Field Study

 Appendix 4.10 Sub-total Correlation Matrix for Science (local) Candidates — the Field Study

 Appendix 4.11 Sub-total Correlation Matrix of RlT for 180 Candidates — the Field Study

 Appendix 4.12 Sub-total Correlation Matrix of RAT for 180 Candidates — the Field Study